The Grading Room

Every food, graded. No vibes — just the numbers.

Home / Versus / Spinach vs Kale

Head to head

Spinach vs Kale

The leafy-green debate nobody asked to settle.

Spinach takes it, 65 to 61. A 4-point gap. The micronutrient density king — 23 calories carrying a multivitamin. Kale’s case: Spinach's sturdier rival — more vitamin C, more crunch, more hype survived. Watch out: Oxalates bind some of its iron and calcium — pair with vitamin C to absorb more.

Tale of the tape

NutrientSpinach
per 100g
Kale
per 100g
Calories23 ●49
Protein2.9g4.3g ●
Total Fat0.4g ●0.9g
Saturated Fat0.1g0.1g
Dietary Fiber2.2g3.6g ●
Sodium79mg38mg ●
Cholesterol0mg0mg
Potassium558mg ●491mg

Red dot marks the winner of each row. Column bases differ because chain labels are per serving — the per-100-calorie comparisons below put them on equal footing.

Where Spinach wins

Where Kale wins

Questions

Is Spinach healthier than Kale?

By our scoring, Spinach grades higher (65 vs 61). The full nutrient comparison is in the tale of the tape above.

Which has more protein, Spinach or Kale?

Spinach: 12.6g per 100 calories. Kale: 8.8g per 100 calories.

How many calories are in Spinach vs Kale?

Spinach: 23 calories per 100g. Kale: 49 calories per 100g.

A note before you eat your screen: grades are computed from published nutrition data with a transparent formula. They are a starting point for thinking about food, not medical advice. Talk to your doctor or a registered dietitian about your diet.